Lesson 8 - MLM / Referral Pyramids

How it works: Multi-level marketing (MLM) pays you mainly for recruiting new participants, not for a product people would buy on its own. Money flows upward from later joiners to earlier ones via entry fees, “education packs,” or mandatory “staking.” When signups slow, payouts shrink and the scheme collapses, leaving the bottom layers with losses. Some versions wrap themselves in a token or “AI bot” to look modern, but the cash flow is the same: new deposits fund old rewards.

Spot it

• Presentations about tiers, ranks, and bonuses—but vague on what the product actually does.
• Earnings tied to how many people you recruit or how much your “team” deposits.
• Packages (Silver/Gold/Platinum) that unlock higher commission rates, not better product capability.

What to do

• If the pitch is recruitment-first, pass. If you’re already in, exit without recruiting others; don’t compound deposits to “unlock” withdrawals.

How It Plays Out

It starts with a favor: “Jump on this call; I want your opinion.” Your friend looks energized in a grid of muted faces. The presenter shares slides that sparkle: a compensation plan with towers of boxes—Associate, Leader, Sapphire, Blue Diamond. Each rank unlocks higher weekly caps and car bonuses. You wait for the product.

When it arrives, it’s abstract. Maybe it’s a “crypto education academy,” maybe an “AI trading bot,” maybe “yield through nodes.” The value props are slippery: learn to trade, let the bot trade, or stake to earn—whichever you like. The numbers are not. “With just five partners each bringing five, you can reach financial freedom.” The math climbs fast because it’s built to.

The dashboard seals it. After you buy a package, your balance grows daily in neat, rounded increments. A progress bar invites you to upgrade to accelerate earnings and “unlock deeper levels.” Your friend says the trick is to go Platinum early so you don’t miss the big commissions when your team arrives. The word team lands softly; what it means is people you bring.

You test the edges. “Can I use the product without recruiting?” The answer is a curve: yes, but the real value is “community,” and the higher tiers only make sense with “leadership.” You ask how the bot works or where the yield comes from. The slide flips to testimonials. You ask whether withdrawals depend on new sales. The chat window goes quiet, then a moderator offers to explain one-on-one.

A week later you notice patterns. The daily earnings don’t care whether the market is up or down. The education modules are repackaged YouTube playlists. The “staking” is a lockup that prevents withdrawals unless you upgrade—which requires a fresh deposit. Ranks appear on your profile before you’ve used anything—because the system measures activity above you and below you, not quality in front of you.

Leaving is simple, if not easy. Withdraw what you can as soon as you can; don’t add funds to “unlock” anything; don’t buffer your loss with other people’s deposits. Send your friend a kind note with what you saw—slides about ranks, not users; earnings that grow with deposits, not usage; withdrawals that depend on upgrades. They may not hear you today. They might remember later.

Pocket anchors: If the diagram sells ranks harder than a product, walk. Revenue from recruitment isn’t revenue. Don’t turn your loss into someone else’s.